Occupational Exposure during Pregnancy and Effects on Newborns: A Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: The protection of pregnant workers should be based on evidence regarding the risks to reproductive health from exposure to specific work environments and conditions. The objective of this study was to identify the effects on mothers and newborns resulting from environmental exposure to various occupational risks. METHODS: The study cohort was composed of 399 women admitted to the Obstetrics/Postpartum ward at Hospital La Fe in Valencia, Spain. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to establish associations between workplace exposure during pregnancy and its effects on maternal and newborn health. Sex, anthropometric characteristics, and blood gas analysis in arterial and venous umbilical cord blood at delivery were collected. RESULTS: A total of 138 women were exposed to biological and/or chemical risks, 122 to physical risks, and 139 at no risk of exposure. In the group with chemical and/or biological risks, the frequency of women who resorted to in vitro fertilization to achieve the studied pregnancy is less than half of the group exposed to physical risks, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.047). The mean values for the arterial analysis in both exposure groups were within average values, with similar pH values between them, but the mean values of PCO2 and PO2 were lower in the group of neonates of mothers exposed to physical risks, with a significant difference for arterial PO2 (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our analysis contributes evidence for planning and prioritizing preventive actions to protect women's reproductive health. The results suggest the continuation of a future project that would consider more factors and potentially increase the sample size.

Outperformance of interleukin-6 over placental alpha microglobulin-1 in predicting preterm delivery in symptomatic women.

BACKGROUND: Threatened preterm labor is the major cause of hospital admission during the second half of pregnancy. An early diagnosis is crucial for adopting pharmacologic measures to reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity. Current diagnostic criteria are based on symptoms and short cervical length. However, there is a high false-positive rate when using these criteria, which implies overtreatment, causing unnecessary side effects and an avoidable economic burden. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the use of placental alpha microglobulin-1 and interleukin-6 as vaginal biomarkers combined with cervical length and other maternal characteristics to improve the prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational study was conducted in women with singleton pregnancies complicated by threatened preterm labor with intact membranes at 24+0 to 34+6 weeks of gestation. A total of 136 women were included in this study. Vaginal fluid was collected with a swab for placental alpha microglobulin-1 determination using the PartoSure test, interleukin-6 was assessed by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, cervical length was measured by transvaginal ultrasound, and obstetrical variables and newborn details were retrieved from clinical records. These characteristics were used to fit univariate binary logistic regression models to predict time to delivery <7 days, time to delivery <14 days, gestational age at delivery ≤34 weeks, and gestational age at delivery ≤37 weeks, and multivariate binary logistic regression models were fitted with imbalanced and balanced data. Performance of models was assessed by their F2-scores and other metrics, and the association of their variables with a risk or a protective factor was studied. RESULTS: A total of 136 women were recruited, of whom 8 were lost to follow-up and 7 were excluded. Of the remaining 121 patients, 22 had a time to delivery <7 days and 31 had a time to delivery <14 days, and 30 deliveries occurred with a gestational age at delivery ≤34 weeks and 55 with a gestational age at delivery ≤37 weeks. Univariate binary logistic regression models fitted with the log transformation of interleukin-6 showed the greatest F2-scores in most studies, which outperformed those of models fitted with placental alpha microglobulin-1 (log[interleukin-6] vs placental alpha microglobulin-1 in time to delivery <7 days: 0.38 vs 0.30; time to delivery <14 days: 0.58 vs 0.29; gestational age at delivery ≤34 weeks: 0.56 vs 0.29; gestational age at delivery ≤37 weeks: 0.61 vs 0.16). Multivariate logistic regression models fitted with imbalanced data sets outperformed most univariate models (F2-score in time to delivery <7 days: 0.63; time to delivery <14 days: 0.54; gestational age at delivery ≤34 weeks: 0.62; gestational age at delivery ≤37 weeks: 0.73). The performance of prediction of multivariate models was drastically improved when data sets were balanced, and was maximum for time to delivery <7 days (F2-score: 0.88±0.2; positive predictive value: 0.86±0.02; negative predictive value: 0.89±0.03). CONCLUSION: A multivariate assessment including interleukin-6 may lead to more targeted treatment, thus reducing unnecessary hospitalization and avoiding unnecessary maternal-fetal treatment.

Effect of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet on Maternal Iron Related Biochemical Parameters during Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain.

Gestation is a crucial life stage for both women and offspring, and outcomes are affected by many environmental factors, including diet. The Mediterranean dietary pattern (MD) is considered a healthy eating pattern that can provide the nutritional requirements of pregnancy. Meanwhile, iron deficiency anemia is one of the most frequent complications related to pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate how the level of adherence to the MD influences maternal gestational weight gain and specific iron-related maternal biochemical parameters during the pregnancy. Accordingly, an observational, population-based study using data from pregnant women conducted over the entire course of their pregnancy was carried out. Adherence to the MD was assessed once using the MEDAS score questionnaire. Of the 506 women studied, 116 (22.9%) were classified as demonstrating a high adherence, 277 (54.7%) a medium adherence, and 113 (22.3%) a low adherence to the MD. No differences were observed in gestational weight gain among the MD adherence groups but the adequacy of weight gain did vary among the groups, with the proportions of inadequate (insufficient or excessive) weight gain presenting the most notable differences. Total anemia prevalence was 5.3%, 15.6%, and 12.3%, respectively, during the first, second, and third trimesters. For iron-related biochemical parameters, no differences are observed among the adherence groups during pregnancy. With high adherence to the MD as the reference group, the crude odds of iron deficiency diagnosis are significant in the first trimester for both the medium [OR = 2.99 (1.55-5.75)] and low [OR = 4.39 (2.15-8.96)] adherence groups, with deficient adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern being responsible for 66.5% (35.5-82.6) and 77.2% (53.5-88.8) of the risk of iron deficiency diagnosis for medium and low adherence, respectively. However, adjusted odds ratios were not significant, possibly due to the small sample size. Our data suggest that MD adherence could be related to gestational weight gain adequacy and that optimal adherence could reduce iron deficiency and/or anemia during pregnancy in the studied population.

Impact of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis on Pregnancy Outcomes In Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To analyze the influence of endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) on embryo transfer (ET) results in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and BioMed Central databases were searched from inception up to December 2022 for studies comparing pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing personalized embryo transfer (pET) by ERA versus standard ET. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random effects model. We identified twelve studies, including 14,224 patients. No differences were observed between patients undergoing ERA test and those not undergoing ERA test prior to ET in terms of live birth (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63-1.58, I2 = 92.7%), clinical pregnancy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.61, I2 = 86.5%), biochemical pregnancy (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46-1.49, I2 = 87%), positive pregnancy test (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.22, I2 = 0%), miscarriage (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.34, I2 = 67.1%), and implantation rate (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.44-3.14, I2 = 93.2%). pET with ERA is not associated with any significant differences in pregnancy outcomes as compared to standard ET protocols. Therefore, the utility of ERA in patients undergoing IVF should be revisited.

Mediterranean Dietary Pattern and Cardiovascular Risk in Pregnant Women.

Nutrition during pregnancy is one of the most important factors that determine the health of a mother and the proper development of her fetus. The main objective of this study was to analyze the association between adherence to a Mediterranean dietary (MedDiet) pattern and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in pregnant women. Accordingly, we carried out an observational, population-based study using data from pregnant women present in a hospital during the entire course of their pregnancy. Adherence to the MedDiet was assessed using the MedDiet score questionnaire. Our study identified that 87.25% (95%CI: 83.48-90.27) of the women had a cardiovascular risk in relation to their dietary intake. Women with diet-related CV risk were more likely to smoke (p = 0.004), weighed more at the beginning of pregnancy, engaged in little physical activity, and had lower adherence to the MedDiet pattern than women without a diet-related CV risk. Dietary analysis showed low consumption of cereals, vegetables, and fish, which failed to satisfy the recommended portions in Spain. Adequate adherence to the MedDiet was found for 54.2% of women who were considered to be without CV risk and 45.8% of women with CV risk. Our data suggest that the MedDiet could be improved in relation to the consumption of cereals, vegetables, and fish during pregnancy in order to reduce CV risk.

Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction technology in SARS-CoV-2-infected women: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perinatal and maternal outcomes of pregnancies in women infected with SARS-CoV-2, comparing spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies (with either own or donor oocytes). DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational study. SETTING: 78 centers participating in the Spanish COVID19 Registry. PATIENT(S): 1,347 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 positive results registered consecutively between February 26 and November 5, 2020. INTERVENTION(S): The patients' information was collected from their medical records, and multivariable regression analyses were performed, controlling for maternal age and the clinical presentation of the infection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Obstetrics and neonatal outcomes, pregnancy comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation need, and medical conditions. RESULT(S): The IVF group included 74 (5.5%) women whereas the spontaneous pregnancy group included 1,275 (94.5%) women. The operative delivery rate was high in all patients, especially in the IVF group, where cesarean section became the most frequent method of delivery (55.4%, compared with 26.1% of the spontaneous pregnancy group). The reason for cesarean section was induction failure in 56.1% of the IVF patients. IVF women had more gestational hypertensive disorders (16.2% vs. 4.5% among spontaneous pregnancy women, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.45-10.93) irrespective of oocyte origin. The higher rate of intensive care unit admittance observed in the IVF group (8.1% vs. 2.4% in the spontaneous pregnancy group) was attributed to preeclampsia (aOR 11.82, 95% CI 5.25-25.87), not to the type of conception. CONCLUSION(S): A high rate of operative delivery was observed in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2, especially in those with IVF pregnancies; method of conception did not affect fetal or maternal outcomes, except for preeclampsia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04558996.

Control del embarazo en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico y síndrome antifosfolípido. Parte 1: Infertilidad, preservación ovárica y valoración preconcepcional. Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (SEGO), Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI) y Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER) / Pregnancy Control in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part 1: Infertility, Ovarian Preservation and Preconception Assessment. Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SEGO), the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER)

Objetivo: El embarazo y el puerperio se consideran una situación de riesgo en mujeres con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) y síndrome antifosfolípido (SAF). Es esencial que especialistas en enfermedades autoinmunes y en embarazo de alto riesgo intervengan en su seguimiento de forma coordinada. La Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna, y la Sociedad Española de Reumatología han constituido un grupo de trabajo paritario para la elaboración de 3 documentos de consenso. Métodos: Las fases del trabajo fueron: distribución del trabajo en grupos correspondientes a los 3 períodos relacionados con la gestación, identificación de áreas clave, revisión de la literatura y formulación de recomendaciones. Resultados: En este primer documento se incluyen las primeras 48 recomendaciones que tratan aspectos relacionados con la infertilidad, la necesidad y los tratamientos de preservación gonadal y la valoración preconcepcional. Conclusiones: Estas recomendaciones multidisciplinares se consideran herramientas en la toma de decisiones para los clínicos involucrados en la asistencia a pacientes con LES/SAF durante el embarazo.(AU)

Objective: Pregnancy and puerperium are considered a risk situation in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Therefore, specialized assessment is essential both preconception and during pregnancy and the puerperium. Likewise, it is very important that different specialists in autoimmune diseases and high-risk pregnancies participate in the follow-up of these patients in a coordinated manner. The Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine, and the Spanish Society of Rheumatology have set up a working group for the preparation of three consensus documents. Methods: The stages of the work were: distribution of work in three groups corresponding to the three periods related to pregnancy (preconception, during pregnancy and childbirth and puerperium), identification of key areas, exhaustive review of the literature and formulation of recommendations. Results: This first document includes the 48 recommendations that address aspects related to infertility, the need for and treatments for gonadal preservation and preconception assessment. Conclusions: These multidisciplinary recommendations are considered decision-making tools for clinicians involved in the care of patients with SLE/APS during pregnancy.(AU)

Obstetric Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Asymptomatic Pregnant Women.

Around two percent of asymptomatic women in labor test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Spain. Families and care providers face childbirth with uncertainty. We determined if SARS-CoV-2 infection at delivery among asymptomatic mothers had different obstetric outcomes compared to negative patients. This was a multicenter prospective study based on universal antenatal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection. A total of 42 hospitals tested women admitted for delivery using polymerase chain reaction, from March to May 2020. We included positive mothers and a sample of negative mothers asymptomatic throughout the antenatal period, with 6-week postpartum follow-up. Association between SARS-CoV-2 and obstetric outcomes was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analyses. In total, 174 asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancies were compared with 430 asymptomatic negative pregnancies. No differences were observed between both groups in key maternal and neonatal outcomes at delivery and follow-up, with the exception of prelabor rupture of membranes at term (adjusted odds ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.13-3.11; p = 0.015). Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers have higher odds of prelabor rupture of membranes at term, without an increase in perinatal complications, compared to negative mothers. Pregnant women testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 at admission for delivery should be reassured by their healthcare workers in the absence of symptoms.

Pregnancy Control in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part 1: Infertility, Ovarian Preservation and Preconception Assessment. Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (SEGO), the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER). / Control del embarazo en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico y síndrome antifosfolípido. Parte 1: Infertilidad, preservación ovárica y valoración preconcepcional. Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia (SEGO), Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI) y Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER).

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy and puerperium are considered a risk situation in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Therefore, specialized assessment is essential both preconception and during pregnancy and the puerperium. Likewise, it is very important that different specialists in autoimmune diseases and high-risk pregnancies participate in the follow-up of these patients in a coordinated manner. The Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine, and the Spanish Society of Rheumatology have set up a working group for the preparation of three consensus documents. METHODS: The stages of the work were: distribution of work in three groups corresponding to the three periods related to pregnancy (preconception, during pregnancy and childbirth and puerperium), identification of key areas, exhaustive review of the literature and formulation of recommendations. RESULTS: This first document includes the 48 recommendations that address aspects related to infertility, the need for and treatments for gonadal preservation and preconception assessment. CONCLUSIONS: These multidisciplinary recommendations are considered decision-making tools for clinicians involved in the care of patients with SLE/APS during pregnancy.

[Spanish registry of Covid-19 screening in asymptomatic pregnants.] / Registro español de cribado de Covid-19 en gestantes asintomáticas.

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish registry of Covid-19 in Spanish pregnant women, made up of 100 centers, is created in response to the need to know the morbidity that Covid-19 generates in pregnant women and their newborns, to know the real incidence of the disease in this population group and to establish and monitor the package of measures to improve their care. The aim of this paper was the creation of a registry of pregnant women with Covid-19 infection in order to establish the interventions and measures necessary to improve the care of these patients during hospital admission. METHODS: To prepare the registry, the main researcher of each center collected weekly / biweekly the number of total pregnant women screened, as well as the total number of positive and negative, sending these data to the responsible researchers so that it could be available in real time of the percentage of infected asymptomatic pregnant population and the evolution by weeks in the centers of each participating province. The data were analyzed using the linear regression test and the Mantel test. RESULTS: As of May 31stsup> 2020, 16,308 screening tests were carried out in these hospitals, in which 338 pregnant women were positive, which translates into 2.07% (95% Confidence Interval: 1.86-2.30) of the asymptomatic pregnant women we attended in our centers were carriers of the virus and could develop the disease in subsequent days. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish epidemiological registry allows us to know the incidence of infection in pregnant women attended in the Spanish delivery centers, as well as the weekly and / or fortnightly evolution of the same, observing a significant decrease in the proportion of positive pregnant women over the total of screenings throughout this period, with an average of 6.5% in early April 2020 to an average of 0.93% positive in late May 2020.

OBJETIVO: El registro español de Covid-19 en embarazadas españolas, integrado por 100 centros, surge en respuesta a la necesidad de conocer la morbilidad que la Covid-19 genera en las gestantes y sus recién nacidos, de conocer la incidencia real de la enfermedad en este grupo poblacional y de establecer y monitorizar el paquete de medidas para mejorar su atención. El objetivo de este estudio fue la creación de un registro de gestantes con infección por Covid-19 con la finalidad de establecer y monitorizar las intervenciones y medidas necesarias para mejorar la atención de estas pacientes durante el ingreso hospitalario. METODOS: Para la elaboración del registro, el investigador principal de cada centro recogió con carácter semanal/quincenal el número de gestantes totales cribadas, así como el total de positivas y negativas, remitiendo a los investigadores responsables estos datos de manera que se pudiera disponer a tiempo real del porcentaje de población gestante asintomática infectada y de la evolución por semanas en los centros de cada provincia participante. Los datos fueron analizados mediante el Test de regresión lineal y test de Mantel. RESULTADOS: A día 31 de mayo de 2020, se realizaron en estos hospitales 16.308 test de cribado, en los cuales 338 gestantes resultaron positivas, lo que se traduce en que un 2,07% (Intervalo de Confianza del 95%: 1,86-2,30) de las gestantes asintomáticas que atendimos en nuestros centros eran portadoras del virus y podían desarrollar la enfermedad en días posteriores. CONCLUSIONES: El registro epidemiológico español permite conocer la incidencia de infección en gestantes atendidas en los paritorios españoles, así como la evolución semanal y/o quincenal de la misma, observándose un descenso significativo de la proporción de gestantes positivas sobre el total de cribadas a lo largo de este periodo, con una media del 6,5% a principios de abril de 2020 hasta una media del 0,93% de positivas a finales de mayo de 2020.

Alteraciones del metabolismo glucídico durante el embarazo. Efectos sobre la madre y el recién nacido / Alterations of carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy. Effects on the mother and new born infant

INTRODUCCIÓN: La diabetes gestacional es la enfermedad que con mayor frecuencia origina alteraciones médicas en el embarazo. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar la relación entre la presencia de alteraciones en el metabolismo de los hidratos de carbono durante el embarazo y el riesgo de presentar resultados obstétricos adversos en la madre y el feto. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio observacional en 799 mujeres que acababan de dar a luz. Se analizaron las características clínicas y obstétricas de las pacientes, así como los datos relacionados con la gestación y el parto, incluyendo el estado del recién nacido. Se evaluó la información con relación a las alteraciones en el metabolismo de los hidratos de carbono. RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN: Para las mujeres con diabetes gestacional encontramos un riesgo de 2,64 veces mayor de pérdida de bienestar fetal y 3,14 veces mayor de requerir hospitalización durante el embarazo. Para las gestantes con intolerancia a los hidratos de carbono encontramos un riesgo de 2,61 veces mayor de requerir episiotomía en el parto vaginal, 7,54 veces mayor de encontrar pérdida del bienestar fetal y 2,06 veces mayor de requerir hospitalización. El grupo de intolerancia a los hidratos de carbono se comportó de forma similar al de la diabetes. CONCLUSIONES: El grupo de intolerancia a los hidratos de carbono es un grupo poco estudiado y se han encontrado alteraciones obstétricas significativas frente al grupo control y similares a las del grupo de diabetes gestacional

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes is the pathology that most frequently causes medical alterations in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the presence of alterations in the metabolism of carbohydrates during pregnancy and the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in mother and foetus. PATIENTS AND METHOD: An observational study was conducted on 799 women who had just given birth. The clinical and obstetric characteristics of the patients, as well as the data related to pregnancy and delivery, including the state of the new born infant were analysed. The information was evaluated in relation to the alterations in carbohydrate metabolism. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: For women with gestational diabetes a 2.64 times greater risk of loss of foetal well-being and 3.14 times greater risk of requiring hospitalization during pregnancy were found. For pregnant women with carbohydrate intolerance, a 2.61 times higher risk of requiring episiotomy in vaginal delivery, a 7.54 times greater risk of finding loss of foetal well-being, and a 2.06 times greater risk of requiring hospitalization were found. The group with carbohydrate intolerance behaved similarly to that with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The group with intolerance to carbohydrates is a little studied group and significant obstetric alterations were found compared to the control group and similar to those of the gestational diabetes group

Alterations of carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy. Effects on the mother and new born infant. / Alteraciones del metabolismo glucídico durante el embarazo. Efectos sobre la madre y el recién nacido.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes is the pathology that most frequently causes medical alterations in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the presence of alterations in the metabolism of carbohydrates during pregnancy and the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in mother and foetus. PATIENTS AND METHOD: An observational study was conducted on 799 women who had just given birth. The clinical and obstetric characteristics of the patients, as well as the data related to pregnancy and delivery, including the state of the new born infant were analysed. The information was evaluated in relation to the alterations in carbohydrate metabolism. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: For women with gestational diabetes a 2.64 times greater risk of loss of foetal well-being and 3.14 times greater risk of requiring hospitalization during pregnancy were found. For pregnant women with carbohydrate intolerance, a 2.61 times higher risk of requiring episiotomy in vaginal delivery, a 7.54 times greater risk of finding loss of foetal well-being, and a 2.06 times greater risk of requiring hospitalization were found. The group with carbohydrate intolerance behaved similarly to that with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The group with intolerance to carbohydrates is a little studied group and significant obstetric alterations were found compared to the control group and similar to those of the gestational diabetes group.

Registro español de cribado de covid-19 en gestantes asintomáticas / Spanish registry of Covid-19 screening in asymptomatic pregnants

OBJETIVO: El registro español de Covid-19 en embarazadas españolas, integrado por 100 centros, surge en respuesta a la necesidad de conocer la morbilidad que la Covid-19 genera en las gestantes y sus recién nacidos, de conocer la incidencia real de la enfermedad en este grupo poblacional y de establecer y monitorizar el paquete de medidas para mejorar su atención. El objetivo de este estudio fue la creación de un registro de gestantes con infección por Covid-19 con la finalidad de establecer y monitorizar las intervenciones y medidas necesarias para mejorar la atención de estas pacientes durante el ingreso hospitalario. MÉTODOS: Para la elaboración del registro, el investigador principal de cada centro recogió con carácter semanal/quincenal el número de gestantes totales cribadas, así como el total de positivas y negativas, remitiendo a los investigadores responsables estos datos de manera que se pudiera disponer a tiempo real del porcentaje de población gestante asintomática infectada y de la evolución por semanas en los centros de cada provincia participante. Los datos fueron analizados mediante el Test de regresión lineal y test de Mantel. RESULTADOS: A día 31 de mayo de 2020, se realizaron en estos hospitales 16.308 test de cribado, en los cuales 338 gestantes resultaron positivas, lo que se traduce en que un 2,07% (Intervalo de Confianza del 95%: 1,86-2,30) de las gestantes asintomáticas que atendimos en nuestros centros eran portadoras del virus y podían desarrollar la enfermedad en días posteriores. CONCLUSIONES: El registro epidemiológico español permite conocer la incidencia de infección en gestantes atendidas en los paritorios españoles, así como la evolución semanal y/o quincenal de la misma, observándose un descenso significativo de la proporción de gestantes positivas sobre el total de cribadas a lo largo de este periodo, con una media del 6,5% a principios de abril de 2020 hasta una media del 0,93% de positivas a finales de mayo de 2020

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish registry of Covid-19 in Spanish pregnant women, made up of 100 centers, is created in response to the need to know the morbidity that Covid-19 generates in pregnant women and their newborns, to know the real incidence of the disease in this population group and to establish and monitor the package of measures to improve their care. The aim of this paper was the creation of a registry of pregnant women with Covid-19 infection in order to establish the interventions and measures necessary to improve the care of these patients during hospital admission. METHODS: To prepare the registry, the main researcher of each center collected weekly / biweekly the number of total pregnant women screened, as well as the total number of positive and negative, sending these data to the responsible researchers so that it could be available in real time of the percentage of infected asymptomatic pregnant population and the evolution by weeks in the centers of each participating province. The data were analyzed using the linear regression test and the Mantel test. RESULTS: As of May 31stsup> 2020, 16,308 screening tests were carried out in these hospitals, in which 338 pregnant women were positive, which translates into 2.07% (95% Confidence Interval: 1.86-2.30) of the asymptomatic pregnant women we attended in our centers were carriers of the virus and could develop the disease in subsequent days. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish epidemiological registry allows us to know the incidence of infection in pregnant women attended in the Spanish delivery centers, as well as the weekly and / or fortnightly evolution of the same, observing a significant decrease in the proportion of positive pregnant women over the total of screenings throughout this period, with an average of 6.5% in early April 2020 to an average of 0.93% positive in late May 2020

Defectos congénitos en recién nacidos y fetos procedentes de interrupción del embarazo tras diagnóstico prenatal en el período 1982-2009 / Evolution of the frequency of congenital defects in newborn infants and fetuses from terminations of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis in the period 1982-2009

Fundamento y objetivo: El estudio de la frecuencia de los defectos congénitos (DC) requiere incluir interrupciones voluntarias del embarazo (IVE) por DC y evaluar los factores que influyen en aquella. Pacientes y método: Serie consecutiva de 517 recién nacidos (RN) y 202 IVE con DC en 38.191 nacimientos entre 1982-2009. Resultados: La frecuencia media de RN con DC es 13,54‰ y la de RN + IVE por DC de 18,73‰. Los DC aislados suponen el 61,12% en RN y el 52,17% en IVE. El 18,37% de los DC en RN y el 40,58% en IVE son sindrómicos. La media de edad gestacional en IVE es 17,92 semanas. La frecuencia global de anencefalia es 2,62 y 6,77 por 10.000, respectivamente, en RN y en RN + IVE. La de la espina bífida es 3,14 y 5,99 por 10.000, respectivamente. La frecuencia global de síndrome de Down es 10,74 por 10.000 RN y 22,14 por 10.000 RN + IVE. El porcentaje de madres extranjeras en nuestra maternidad alcanza el 35,9% en 2009. La media de edad materna asciende significativamente a lo largo del tiempo. Conclusiones: Observamos una disminución estadísticamente significativa de DC en RN, pero no en su concepción. No detectamos prevención primaria de anencefalia ni espina bífida. El descenso de síndrome de Down en RN no alcanza significación estadística. La diversidad étnica y la mayor edad materna pueden estar modificando la frecuencia. El 53% de los casos (RN + IVE) con DC del trienio 2007-2009 fueron IVE. Se precisa el estudio completo de IVE por DC para ofrecer consejo reproductivo (AU)

Background and objective: The study of congenital defects (CD) must include termination of pregnancy (TOP) for CD and evaluate risk factors that modify their frequency. Patients and methods: Consecutive series of 517 newborn and 202 TOP with CD among 38,191 childbirths, between 1982-2009 years. Results: The mean frequency for newborns with CD is 13.54‰ and for newborn and TOP with CD is 18.73‰. Single CD are 61.12% in newborns and 52.17% in TOP. The 18.37% of CD in newborn and 40.58% of TOP are syndromic. Mean gestational age for TOP is 17.92 weeks. Overall frequency of anencephaly is 2.62‰ for newborns and 6.77 for 10,000 for newborns and TOP. Spina bifida is 3.14 for 10,000 newborns and 5.99 for 10,000 newborns and TOP. Overall frequency of Down syndrome (DS) is 10.74 for 10,000 newborns and 22.14 for 10,000 newborns and TOP. The percentage of foreign mothers was 35.9% in 2009 and the mean maternal age significantly increased in this period. Conclusion: We observe a significant decrease of CD in newborns but not in their conception. We have not detected primary prevention for neural tube defects. The decrease in DS in newborns is not statistically relevant but ethnic diversity and maternal aging may be modifying the frequency. The 53% of CD were TOP in the period 2007-2009. It is mandatory a complete study for CD in TOP in order to offer serious reproductive counseling (AU)

[Evolution of the frequency of congenital defects in newborn infants and fetuses from terminations of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis in the period 1982-2009]. / Defectos congénitos en recién nacidos y fetos procedentes de interrupción del embarazo tras diagnóstico prenatal en el período 1982-2009.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The study of congenital defects (CD) must include termination of pregnancy (TOP) for CD and evaluate risk factors that modify their frequency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive series of 517 newborn and 202 TOP with CD among 38,191 childbirths, between 1982-2009 years. RESULTS: The mean frequency for newborns with CD is 13.54‰ and for newborn and TOP with CD is 18.73‰. Single CD are 61.12% in newborns and 52.17% in TOP. The 18.37% of CD in newborn and 40.58% of TOP are syndromic. Mean gestational age for TOP is 17.92 weeks. Overall frequency of anencephaly is 2.62‰ for newborns and 6.77 for 10,000 for newborns and TOP. Spina bifida is 3.14 for 10,000 newborns and 5.99 for 10,000 newborns and TOP. Overall frequency of Down syndrome (DS) is 10.74 for 10,000 newborns and 22.14 for 10,000 newborns and TOP. The percentage of foreign mothers was 35.9% in 2009 and the mean maternal age significantly increased in this period. CONCLUSION: We observe a significant decrease of CD in newborns but not in their conception. We have not detected primary prevention for neural tube defects. The decrease in DS in newborns is not statistically relevant but ethnic diversity and maternal aging may be modifying the frequency. The 53% of CD were TOP in the period 2007-2009. It is mandatory a complete study for CD in TOP in order to offer serious reproductive counselling.

Listeriosis y embarazo. ¿Es realmente tan infrecuente? / Listeriosis in pregnancy. Is it really so infrequent?

La listeriosis es una enfermedad poco común en la población general; sin embargo, tiene importancia en las gestantes y recién nacidos, por lo que se debería advertir a la gestantes de su existencia y sus posibles vías de transmisión (carnes poco cocinadas, quesos frescos, productos lácteos no pasteurizados o comidas preparadas). En España, la incidencia se estima en aproximadamente de 0,5 casos/millón habitantes/año. La incidencia en gestantes es mayor que la observada en la población general; se estima en aproximadamente 12/100.000 habitantes. Nosotros tuvimos una incidencia de 1,5 casos/1.000 habitantes, lo que constituye un incremento importante respecto a lo descrito en la literatura científica. En los años anteriores (2003 y 2004), tan sólo se había detectado 1 caso de listeriosis. No presenta manifestaciones clínicas específicas ni en la madre ni en el recién nacido. El clínico debe aumentar sus sospechas frente a la historia de prematuridad, aborto espontáneo y feto muerto. Es necesario pensar en ella ante una gestante con fiebre y amenaza de parto prematuro. El diagnóstico de certeza viene dado por el cultivo de líquido amniótico, líquido cefalorraquídeo o hemocultivos, por lo que en una gestante con fiebre de origen desconocido, con o sin amenaza de parto prematuro, está justificada la realización de amniocentesis o hemocultivos. El tratamiento de elección es la ampicilina asociada o no a gentamicina, a altas dosis y durante un período prolongado

Listeriosis is uncommon in the general population but is far more frequent in pregnant women and newborns. Consequently, expectant mothers should be warned about this disease and its possible routes of transmission (insufficiently cooked meats, fresh cheeses, unpasteurized milk, and prepared food). In Spain, the incidence of listeriosis is considered to be approximately 0.5 cases/million inhabitants/per year. In pregnant women this incidence is higher, being approximately 12 cases/100,000 inhabitants. We found an incidence of 1.5 cases per 1,000 inhabitants, which represents a substantial increase over that described in the literature. In previous years (2003 and 2004), only one single case of listeriosis was detected. This disease has no specific clinical manifestations in the mother or newborn. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and take careful note of a history of prematurity, spontaneous abortion and fetal demise. Listeriosis should be considered in pregnant women with fever and threatened premature delivery. Definitive diagnosis is given by culture of amniotic liquid, cerebrospinal fluid or blood culture; consequently, in women with fever of unknown origin, with or without threatened premature delivery, the performance of amniocentesis or blood culture is warranted. The treatment of choice is ampicillin alone or associated with gentamycin, at high doses and for prolonged periods